To view or print PDF content, download the free Adobe Acrobat Reader.

Appendix A:
Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing,
Other Financial Crimes, and the Bank Secrecy Act
Bank Secrecy Act requirements serve
to deter financial crimes, to detect
them when they occur, and to
support attempts to bring the perpetrators
to justice. This section provides an
overview of major financial crimes and
describes ways that Bank Secrecy Act
recordkeeping and reporting requirements
are helping to detect these activities and
the individuals behind them.
Money Laundering
Money laundering is the disguising of
funds derived from illicit activity so that
they may be used without detection of
the illegal activity that produced them.
Money laundering may be attempted by
individuals, small and large businesses,
corrupt officials, and individuals involved in
organized crime, such as drug dealers or
Mafia members.
Money laundering poses international
and national security threats. It can fuel
organized crime, corrupt financial systems,
undermine free enterprise by crowding out
the private sector, and threaten financial
stability.
Money laundering involves three stages:
placement, layering, and integration.
•
Placement involves physically
placing illegally obtained money
into the financial system or the retail
economy. “Dirty” money is most
vulnerable to detection and seizure
during placement.
•
Layering means separating the
illegally obtained money from its
source through a series of financial
transactions that make it difficult to
trace the origin of the funds.
•
Integration means converting
the illicit funds into a seemingly
legitimate form. Integration may
include the purchase of businesses,
automobiles, real estate, and other
assets.
Some money laundering placement
methods specifically attempt to evade Bank
Secrecy Act requirements. These include:
•
Structuring-- An individual makes
two or more cash transactions
below the dollar thresholds for Bank
Secrecy Act reporting and record
keeping thresholds in order to avoid
detection.
•
Smurfing-- Two or more individuals
deposit cash or buy bank drafts in
amounts under Bank Secrecy Act
reporting requirements.
During the layering phase of money
laundering, criminals often take advantage
of legitimate financial mechanisms in
attempts to hide the source of their funds.
A few of the many mechanisms that may
be misused during layering are currency
exchanges, wire transmitting services,
prepaid cards that offer global access to
cash via automated teller machines and
goods at point of sale, internet-based
e-value systems, casino services, and
domestic shell corporations lacking real
assets and business activity that are set up
to hold and move illicit funds.
Money launderers may also attempt to
mix "dirty" funds with clean. For example,
criminals may take over or invest in
businesses that generate large cash
proceeds and mix illicit funds with those of
the legitimate business. In addition, money
launderers may take part in criminal activity
specifically designed to hide the proceeds
of other criminal acts. For instance, they
may set up fraudulent invoicing schemes
that over- or undervalue goods being
traded.
Suspicious Activity Report leads to Investigation, Sentencing of Marijuana Grower
A defendant was sentenced to prison, followed by several years' probation, after pleading guilty
to narcotics trafficking charges and structuring financial transactions to evade Bank Secrecy Act
currency reporting requirements in connection with a marijuana growing operation. The defendant
incorporated a business falsely described in corporate documents as a real property development
company. The defendant used the business to purchase acreage, set up the marijuana growing
operation, and hired people to run it.
According to the plea agreement, the defendant admitted to making over 100 cash deposits to the
corporate account over several years. The cash deposits totaled more than $1 million, but each
deposit was less than $10,000. This investigation was initiated based on the filing of a Suspicious
Activity Report. (Source: Internal Revenue Service-Criminal Investigation)
The SAR Activity Review-- Trends, Tips & Issues
Issue 8, April 2005
Terrorist Financing
Terrorists require funds to support their
deadly activities and must move those
funds to individuals or cells in particular
target areas. The amount needed for a
particular attack may be relatively small,
but larger amounts are needed to recruit,
transport, train, house, pay, and equip
terrorist agents.
Some terrorist funding comes from illicit
activity, including traditional crimes such as
kidnapping for ransom, narcotics trafficking,
extortion, credit card fraud, counterfeiting,
and smuggling. Other funds come from
the following sources:
•
Supporters - A significant portion
of terrorists’ funding comes from
supporters. Willing donors include
wealthy individuals and their
families, supportive social and
religious organizations, and rogue
nations.
•
Corruption of charities - Terrorist
groups have created charitable
fronts and have sought out corrupt
or vulnerable non-profits to raise
and move money, to transport
operatives and materiel, to recruit
and indoctrinate new members,
and to support family members
of operatives or deceased suicide
bombers.
Terrorist financiers may use money
laundering methods to hide the source,
purpose, and movement of their assets.
For example, they may use commodities,
false invoicing, and other trade
manipulation to move funds.
Criminal organizations and terrorists sometimes
employ the services of the same
professionals, including personal services
providers such as accountants and lawyers,
to help disguise their funds.
Terrorist operatives may attempt to smuggle
cash - or precious metals, stones, or jewels
- across borders or may use couriers to
attempt to transport these items. Likewise,
terrorists may rely on currency exchangers
to transfer funds, especially in countries
where cash is typically used to settle
accounts.
Terrorists have used informal value
transfer systems, such as those known
as “hawala” or "hundi." These systems
use trusted networks of people who
move funds and settle accounts with
little or no documentation. Such systems
are prevalent throughout Asia and the
Middle East as well as within expatriate
communities in other regions. In the
United States, money transmitters involved
in informal value transfer systems are
required, under the Bank Secrecy Act, to
register as money services businesses,
develop anti-money laundering programs,
and report suspicious activity.
Terrorists also use traditional financial
institutions and mechanisms to move their
funds. The 9/11 Commission found that
Al Qaeda funded the hijackers in the United
States through wire transfers from overseas,
by physically moving cash and traveler's
checks into the country, and by accessing
funds held in foreign accounts through
debit or credit cards. Suspicious Activity
Reports filed under the Bank Secrecy Act
are a valuable source of information about
potential terrorist financing activity.
Suspicious Activity Report Initiates Material
Support of Terrorism Investigation
The Federal Bureau of Investigation initiated a Material Support of Terrorism investigation based
on a Suspicious Activity Report filed by a bank detailing a series of overseas financial transactions
totaling millions of dollars. Two of the participants in these transactions were a United States-based
company and a money services business based in the Middle East. The bank was concerned
by the unorthodox manner in which the transactions were executed and the disparate business
operations of the participants. All of the money passed through an account held at the United
States branch of a foreign bank headquartered in the Middle East.
During a seven-month period, millions of dollars passed through the money services business's
bank account, immediately dispersing funds to scores of businesses and individuals around the
world. Although the purpose of these payments is still under investigation, some of the recipients
are known for, or suspected of, involvement in terrorist activities. (Source: Federal Bureau of
Investigation)
The SAR Activity Review-- Trends, Tips & Issues
Issue 8, April 2005
Other Financial Crimes
In addition to money laundering and
terrorist financing, Bank Secrecy Act reports
provide valuable leads and information
for law enforcement and intelligence
agencies investigating a wide variety of
financial crimes. Examples are tax evasion,
many types of fraud, embezzlement,
counterfeiting, bribery, insider trading,
and identity theft. The Financial Crimes
Enforcement Network provides authorized
law enforcement agencies controlled access
to reported Bank Secrecy Act data so that
investigators of these crimes can "follow
the money." We also identify and refer to
appropriate authorities potential evidence
of financial crimes, provide analytical
support for cases with a significant financial
component, and assist in managing cases
with a large number of subjects and/or
large numbers of relevant Bank Secrecy Act
reports.
Business owner Sentenced for Tax Evasion
A business owner was sentenced to several years in prison followed by three years supervised
release and ordered to pay a fine of nearly $1 million. The defendant was convicted of three
counts of tax evasion and one count of structuring a financial transaction to avoid federal currency
transaction reporting requirements. According to trial evidence, the defendant reported no taxable
income and paid no federal income tax during three years, although the two businesses the
defendant owned and operated were profitable and the defendant was earning a substantial
taxable income from their operations.
The defendant, an accountant by training, engaged in a complicated tax evasion scheme which
involved diverting hundreds of thousands of dollars from the businesses into personal investment
accounts held in the name of the defendant's spouse. The defendant created a phony shareholder
loan account to make it appear that the corporations that owned the businesses owed the
defendant money and then took false "bad debt" deductions on the defendant's own tax returns
to offset the income earned personal investment accounts belonging to the defendant and the
defendant's spouse. This investigation was initiated based on the filing of a Suspicious Activity
Report. (Source: Internal Revenue Service-Criminal Investigation)
The SAR Activity Review - Trends, Tips & Issues
Issue 8, April 2005